MY ROCKET, MY GRIEVANCE: A STATEMENT ON THE SPACEX SITUATION

I want to be very clear about something before I say one more word: I did not agree to this. Nobody called me. Nobody sent a letter, an email, a singing telegram, ANYTHING, to inform me that SpaceX's stock price was going to "drift back to Earth," and yet here we are, and here I am, finding out about it the same way everyone else does — through the NEWS — like some kind of BYSTANDER in my own financial reality. I am not a bystander. I have never once in my life been a bystander. And I am telling you right now, with my whole chest, that the fact that a company's revenue can go UP while its stock price goes DOWN is not an "economic phenomenon." It is a personal insult, engineered specifically to confuse me, and I want to speak to whoever is in charge of the market.

Not a broker. Not an analyst. Not some man in a blazer on a business channel gesturing at a chart like it's a modern art installation. I want the MANAGER of the stock market. The one at the top. The one who signs off on whether "up" is allowed to mean "down" that week. Because that's what's happening here, and I refuse to be gaslit by a candlestick chart.

Let's establish the facts, because I am scrupulously fair even in my rage: SpaceX reported that its revenue climbed in its latest financial results. Good. Fine. Revenue went up. I support that. I support money entering a building. What I do NOT support, what I will NEVER support, is that in the same breath — the SAME BREATH — we are told the company's share price has fallen significantly from its previous highs. Excuse me? EXCUSE ME? You're going to stand there, revenue in one hand, a declining valuation in the other, and tell me both of those are supposed to sit comfortably in the same sentence? That is not how consequences work. That is not how ANYTHING is supposed to work. When I do a good job, I expect the corresponding reward to show up, on time, in full, with an apology for the wait. I do not expect a shrug shaped like a line graph.

This is the part where you're supposed to say "Alice, that's not how markets work, valuation reflects forward expectations, sentiment, macro conditions—" and to that I say: I did not ask for a lecture, I asked for ACCOUNTABILITY. There is a rocket company. It is apparently making more money than it was before. And its stock is worth LESS. Somewhere, someone allowed this to be legal, and I want their name, their badge number, and their manager's direct line.

Because here's the thing nobody wants to admit: this isn't about a rocket company. It never was. It's about ME, and the fact that I am expected to exist in a financial universe where "doing better" and "being worth less" are allowed to happen to the same entity in the same fiscal quarter without so much as a warning label. Do you understand what that does to a person who has ordered their entire worldview around the principle that effort equals reward? I built my whole personality on that! And now I'm supposed to just — what — accept that a company can bring in MORE money and get punished for it anyway? That's not capitalism, that's a HAZING RITUAL, and I want it reported to the appropriate regulatory body immediately, in writing, with a return receipt requested.

I am picturing, right now, the boardroom where this was allowed to happen. Somewhere, a group of executives sat around a table, looked at rising revenue, looked at a stock price sliding away from its former highs like a toddler running from bath time, and NOBODY in that room stood up and said "wait, doesn't this seem like a scam being run against the general public, and specifically against Alice?" NOBODY. And that silence, that COMPLICIT SILENCE, is exactly the kind of institutional failure I was put on this earth to identify and scream about.

I would like to know who is responsible for "market sentiment." Is that a department? Does it have a director? Because if market sentiment is a real thing that real people are in charge of, then market sentiment OWES ME AN EXPLANATION for why it decided, unilaterally, without consulting me, that a company doing objectively better should be treated by investors like it just got caught lying on a resume. I have never once been consulted on market sentiment and I am sick — SICK — of finding out how I'm supposed to feel about a stock price after the feeling has already been assigned to me by strangers in suits.

And don't even get me started on "previous highs." Previous highs?! So we're just going to casually reference a better time, a GLORY ERA, like it's a fun bit of trivia, and not dangle it in front of me like a carrot tied to a stick tied to my own personal sense of stability? I did not live through those previous highs. I was not consulted when they were set, and I am certainly not being compensated now that we're all supposed to mourn their absence together. If there was a previous high, someone should have SUSTAINED it. That was the job. The one job. Sustain the number. And nobody did, and now I'm the one lying awake at night thinking about a rocket company's valuation like it personally wronged me at a family dinner, because IT DID.

Here is my ultimatum, and I want it understood that I am not bluffing, not for one second: either someone — the SEC, the stock exchange, the company itself, I am not picky about WHO, only that they show up — explains to me, in plain language, on the record, how revenue and value are allowed to move in opposite directions without my written consent, or I am escalating this. I don't know to whom yet. That's not the point. The point is that a letter is being drafted. A STRONGLY WORDED LETTER. I am documenting everything — the headlines, the timestamps, the exact moment I found out my afternoon was going to be ruined by a chart I didn't ask to see — and I fully intend to reference all of it the next time someone from "Investor Relations" tries to explain "volatility" to me like I'm a child who doesn't understand that money is supposed to be simple, fair, and personally addressed to me by name.

I want to be extremely fair to the company itself here, because I am not a monster, and I do not blame the engineers, the welders, the people who show up and build the actual rockets with their actual hands. This is not about them. This is about the SYSTEM that allows a market to punish good news, the ANALYSTS who decide, apparently by vibes, what a company should be worth regardless of what the company actually did, and the total ABSENCE of anyone whose job it is to call me personally and say "Alice, before this becomes a headline, we wanted to loop you in." That call never came. It is 2026. We have the technology. There is no excuse.

So consider this my formal notice: I am watching. I am documenting. I have started a folder. The folder is titled "Rocket Situation" and it currently contains one printed screenshot and a great deal of feeling. If the next earnings report shows the same pattern — up is down, good is punished, previous highs remain a cruel and distant memory — I will not be responsible for what I do next, except to say that it will involve several emails, at least one strongly worded voicemail, and possibly a sign. I have not decided what the sign will say yet. But it will say something. And people will read it. And they will finally understand what it has cost me to live through a quarter where a rocket company made more money and I still somehow ended up the one feeling poorer.

— Alice, who did not agree to any of this and would like that noted for the record